by hoangpm96 · MCP Server · ★ 96
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/<you>/reqwise-figma-mcp.git
Taken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 96 |
| Forks | 39 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-18 |
| Created | 2026-07-07 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
Reqwise Figma MCP An MCP server that lets AI agents read and draw on the Figma canvas — safely. Reqwise Figma MCP pairs a local MCP server with a companion Figma plugin. Point Claude Code, Cursor, or any MCP-capable agent at it, and the agent can inspect a Figma file and draw into it by executing JavaScript against a proxy API — with the plugin layer catching the mistakes that usually turn "AI...
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: