esp-mcp — security grade SAFE, quality 70/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 70/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by horw · MCP Server · ★ 157

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is esp-mcp safe to install? View the security audit →

About esp-mcp

Goal The goal of this MCP is to: Consolidate ESP-IDF and related project commands in one place. Simplify getting started using only LLM communication. How to contribute to the project Simply find a command that is missing from this MCP and create a PR for it! If you want someone to help you with this implementation, just open an issue. Notice This project is currently a Proof of Concept (PoC) for an MCP server tailored for ESP-IDF workflows. Current Capabilities: Core Features: : Install ESP-IDF dependencies and toolchain via . : Create a new ESP-IDF project. : Set target chip for ESP-IDF projects (esp32, esp32c3, esp32s3, etc.). : Build ESP-IDF projects with incremental build support. : List available serial ports for ESP devices. : Flash built firmware to connected ESP devices. : Run pytest tests with pytest-embedded support for ESP-IDF projects. Additional Features: Flexible ESP-IDF path management: supports per-project ESP-IDF versions via parameter. SDK config management: supports custom files for build configuration (multiple files can be specified separated by semicolons). Build time trackin

esp-idfesp32mcpmcp-server

Quick Facts

Stars157
Forks20
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
Quality Score69.7664463127525/100
Open Issues34
Last Updated2025-12-27
Created2025-03-24
Platformsmcp, python
Est. Tokens~717k

esp-mcp alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a esp-mcp alternative? If you're comparing esp-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • ESP32MCPServer by navado · ⭐ 58

    Allow AI models connect to ESP32 and read connected sensors NMEA2k, ODB/ODBII, NMEA0183. AI generated MCP serv

  • dcp by device-context-protocol · ⭐ 57

    Device Context Protocol — bridge LLM agents to physical devices. Sub-50-byte frames, 27.6KB flash / 0.6KB RAM

  • AgentDeck by puritysb · ⭐ 254

    Local dashboards and physical controls for AI coding agents — native 3D aquariums, Stream Deck, Apple/Android

  • m5-paper-buddy by op7418 · ⭐ 161

    📟 Claude Code physical companion on M5Paper V1.1 e-ink. Multi-session dashboard, hardware approval (buttons +

  • ai-desk-card by op7418 · ⭐ 150

    桌面 AI 副屏 Skill:M5Paper 墨水屏 + AI Agent 推送 widget。装 Skill 后由 Agent 自动引导烧固件、配 Wi-Fi、推送内容。本地运行、无云依赖。

  • aurora-smart-home by tonylofgren · ⭐ 104

    Independent Claude Skills for the whole smart home: Home Assistant, ESPHome, Node-RED, custom integrations, da

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is esp-mcp?

esp-mcp is Centralize ESP32 related commands and simplify getting started with seamless, LLM-driven interaction and help.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 157 GitHub stars.

What programming language is esp-mcp written in?

esp-mcp is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as esp-idf, esp32, mcp.

How do I install or use esp-mcp?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the esp-mcp GitHub repository at github.com/horw/esp-mcp. The project has 157 stars and 20 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to esp-mcp?

The top alternatives to esp-mcp on Agent Skills Hub include ESP32MCPServer, dcp, AgentDeck. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools