by hyperb1iss · MCP Server · ★ 69
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
brew install hyperb1iss/tap/sibyl
Taken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
Flagged: install step in a code block runs a script from an untrusted host. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 69 |
| Forks | 9 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 71/100 |
| Open Issues | 5 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-05 |
| Created | 2025-12-21 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
One CLI. One graph. Every AI tool you use, sharing memory. ✦ Cross-agent memory for AI coding tools · self-hostable · yours to keep ✦
These tools work well together with sibyl for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a sibyl alternative? If you're comparing sibyl with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Open-source governed, local-first memory control plane for AI agents and teams. arXiv:2608.08253
Persistent memory for AI coding agents
Persistent long-term memory for Claude Code via MCP — captures coding decisions, bugfixes, and context across
Local-first persistent agentic memory powered by Recursive Memory Harness (RMH). Open source must win.
Human-like memory for AI agents — semantic, episodic & procedural. Experience-driven procedures that learn fro
Notion MCP server with token auth: connect Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code and Codex to Notion pa
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: