llm-wiki-kit — security grade SAFE, quality 65/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 65/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by iamsashank09 · MCP Server · ★ 62

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is llm-wiki-kit safe to install? View the security audit →

About llm-wiki-kit

📚 llm-wiki-kit Stop re-explaining your research to your AI agent every session. llm-wiki-kit gives your AI agent a persistent, structured memory that compounds over time. Drop PDFs, URLs, YouTube videos — your agent builds a wiki, connects the dots, and remembers everything across sessions. Based on Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern. Works with Claude, Codex, Cursor, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible agent. https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8814a581-1832-4e94-a5df-9e9b6b041507 The Problem Every time you start a new chat: You're constantly re-teaching your agent things it should already know. The Solution With llm-wiki-kit, your agent maintains its own knowledge base: The wiki persists. Cross-references build up. Your agent gets smarter with every source you add.

ai-agentknowledge-basellmllm-toolsmcpmcp-server

Quick Facts

Stars62
Forks14
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score65.4879155777883/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-04-08
Created2026-04-07
Platformsmcp, python
Est. Tokens~6k

llm-wiki-kit alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a llm-wiki-kit alternative? If you're comparing llm-wiki-kit with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • FirstData by MLT-OSS · ⭐ 183

    The World's Most Comprehensive, Authoritative, and Structured Open Source Data Source Knowledge Base

  • claude-prompts by minipuft · ⭐ 182

    MCP server for reusable prompt templates, multi-step workflow chains, and quality gates — compose agentic work

  • gopher-mcp by GopherSecurity · ⭐ 149

    C++ MCP SDK - build Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers and clients in C++ / CPP. Enterprise-grade security,

  • seline by tercumantanumut · ⭐ 143

    Seline is a local-first AI desktop application that brings together conversational AI, visual generation tools

  • oxylabs-mcp by oxylabs · ⭐ 104

    Official Oxylabs MCP integration

  • deterministic-agent-control-protocol by elliot35 · ⭐ 88

    Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is llm-wiki-kit?

llm-wiki-kit is Stop re-explaining your research to your AI agent. Persistent, LLM-maintained wikis that compound over time. Drop PDFs, URLs, YouTube - your agent remembers forever. Based on Karpathy's LLM Wiki patte. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 62 GitHub stars.

What programming language is llm-wiki-kit written in?

llm-wiki-kit is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as ai-agent, knowledge-base, llm.

How do I install or use llm-wiki-kit?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the llm-wiki-kit GitHub repository at github.com/iamsashank09/llm-wiki-kit. The project has 62 stars and 14 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does llm-wiki-kit use?

llm-wiki-kit is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to llm-wiki-kit?

The top alternatives to llm-wiki-kit on Agent Skills Hub include FirstData, claude-prompts, gopher-mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools