browserclaw — security grade SAFE, quality 63/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 63/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by idan-rubin · Codex Skill · ★ 75

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is browserclaw safe to install? View the security audit →

About browserclaw

The browser tool, not the agent. You bring the brain. The AI-native browser automation library — born from OpenClaw, built on Playwright, embeddable in any TS/Node agent loop. Snapshot + ref targeting: no CSS selectors, no XPath, no vision model — just numbered refs that map to interactive elements. Most other tools in this space ship a complete AI agent: they take your task, own the LLM loop, decide what to click, and click it. Great — until you already have an agent. Then you've got two brains fighting over who's in charge. browserclaw is just the eyes and hands. Call and get an AI-readable text tree where every interactive e

accessibilityaiai-agentbrowser-automationcdpchromellmopenclawplaywrightsnapshot

Quick Facts

Stars75
Forks7
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score62.9500266918046/100
Last Updated2026-09-30
Created2026-02-08
Platformsbrowser, node
Est. Tokens~23k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with browserclaw for enhanced workflows:

  • Uni-CLI — semantic(0.36)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (67%)

browserclaw alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a browserclaw alternative? If you're comparing browserclaw with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • camofox-mcp by redf0x1 · ⭐ 99

    Anti-detection browser MCP server for AI agents — navigate, interact, and automate the web without getting blo

  • Uni-CLI by olo-dot-io · ⭐ 271

    One command for every interface—search, run, and inspect real software across APIs, browsers, desktops, local

  • agent-browser-mcp by 335234131 · ⭐ 239

    让 Agent 直接操作真实 Chrome 的 MCP 服务,支持页面扫描、CDP、截图与物理输入

  • decodo-openclaw-skill by Decodo · ⭐ 151

    OpenClaw skill for scraping any URL using the Decodo Web Scraping API.

  • apitap by n1byn1kt · ⭐ 126

    CLI, MCP server, and npm library that turns any website into an API — no docs, no SDK, no browser.

  • utcp-mcp by universal-tool-calling-protocol · ⭐ 205

    All-in-one MCP server that can connect your AI agents to any native endpoint, powered by UTCP

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is browserclaw?

browserclaw is The AI-native browser automation library. Snapshot + ref targeting — born from OpenClaw, built for agents, by agents.. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 75 GitHub stars.

What programming language is browserclaw written in?

browserclaw is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as accessibility, ai, ai-agent.

How do I install or use browserclaw?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the browserclaw GitHub repository at github.com/idan-rubin/browserclaw. The project has 75 stars and 7 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does browserclaw use?

browserclaw is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to browserclaw?

The top alternatives to browserclaw on Agent Skills Hub include camofox-mcp, Uni-CLI, agent-browser-mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools