Dragon-Brain — security grade SAFE, quality 68/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 68/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by iikarus · MCP Server · ★ 51

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is Dragon-Brain safe to install? View the security audit →

About Dragon-Brain

Dragon Brain English Français Memory infrastructure for AI agents — that fails loud, by design. []() []() []() [-blue)]() []() 100% LongMemEval R@5 · 34 MCP tools · sub-200ms hybrid search · CI-gated fail-loud contracts · No LLM req

ai-memoryclaudecodex-clicursorfalkordbgemini-cliknowledge-graphllm-toolsmcpmemory

Quick Facts

Stars51
Forks8
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score68.4802071418517/100
Open Issues6
Last Updated2026-08-22
Created2026-02-23
Platformsclaude-code, cli, codex, docker, gemini, mcp, python
Est. Tokens~20k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with Dragon-Brain for enhanced workflows:

  • automem — semantic(0.38)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+shared_platform (57%)
  • codemem — semantic(0.23)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (53%)
  • agent-second-brain — semantic(0.19)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (52%)

Dragon-Brain alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a Dragon-Brain alternative? If you're comparing Dragon-Brain with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • omega-memory by omega-memory · ⭐ 219

    Persistent memory for AI coding agents

  • claude-self-reflect by ramakay · ⭐ 219

    Claude forgets everything. This fixes that. 🔗 www.npmjs.com/package/claude-self-reflect

  • mem0-mcp-selfhosted by elvismdev · ⭐ 106

    Self-hosted mem0 MCP server for Claude Code. Run a complete memory server against self-hosted Qdrant + Neo4j +

  • mcp-automem by verygoodplugins · ⭐ 64

    MCP client for AutoMem — give Claude, Cursor, Codex, and other MCP tools durable graph+vector memory across co

  • Kaimon.jl by kahliburke · ⭐ 50

    MCP server giving AI agents full access to Julia's runtime via a live Gate — code execution, introspection, de

  • MoltBrain by nhevers · ⭐ 252

    Long-term memory layer for OpenClaw & MoltBook agents that learns and recalls your project context automatical

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Dragon-Brain?

Dragon-Brain is Dragon Brain — persistent long-term memory for AI agents via MCP (Model Context Protocol). Knowledge graph (FalkorDB) + vector search (Qdrant) + CUDA GPU embeddings. Works with Claude, Gemini CLI, Cur. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 51 GitHub stars.

What programming language is Dragon-Brain written in?

Dragon-Brain is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as ai-memory, claude, codex-cli.

How do I install or use Dragon-Brain?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the Dragon-Brain GitHub repository at github.com/iikarus/Dragon-Brain. The project has 51 stars and 8 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does Dragon-Brain use?

Dragon-Brain is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to Dragon-Brain?

The top alternatives to Dragon-Brain on Agent Skills Hub include omega-memory, claude-self-reflect, mem0-mcp-selfhosted. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools