by iklynow-hue · Codex Skill · ★ 28
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 28 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| Quality Score | 70/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-06-30 |
| Created | 2026-03-12 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, node, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
SEO/GEO site audit skill for Codex and Claude Code with capped crawling, template-aware sampling, and bilingual HTML reporting powered by local Lighthouse or PageSpeed API.
Looking for a seo-geo-skills alternative? If you're comparing seo-geo-skills with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Comprehensive configuration management for AI coding tools - Replicate my complete setup for Claude Code, Open
Claude Code 자동화 플러그인 — SEO, 보안, 팀 에이전트, PRD, 레딧 리서치를 커맨드 하나로
Portable SKILLs workspace for Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini — issue-driven workflows and cross-agent collabor
Vendor-neutral MCP configuration manager — one CLI to add, toggle, and audit MCP servers and skills across eve
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
Local citation-backed recall for Pi, OMP, Claude Code, Codex, and ChatGPT history.
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: