lazyagent — security grade SAFE, quality 74/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 74/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by illegalstudio · Codex Skill · ★ 187

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is lazyagent safe to install? View the security audit →

About lazyagent

lazyagent A terminal UI, macOS menu bar app, and HTTP API for monitoring all your coding agents — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, pi, and OpenCode — from a single place. No lock-in, no server, purely observational. Inspired by lazygit, lazyworktree, and pixel-agents. Why lazyagent? Unlike other tools, lazyagent doesn't replace your workflow — it watches it. Launch agents wherever you want (terminal, IDE, desktop app), lazyagent just observes. No lock-in, no server, no account required. ⭐ If lazyagent is useful to you, consider starring the repo — it helps others discover it! Want to support lazyagent's development? If this project saves you time or you just love it, consider becoming a sponsor. It keeps the project alive and growing — every bit counts! Terminal UI ![lazyagent TUI

agent-dashboardagent-monitoringaiclaude-codeclaude-code-monitorclicodexcoding-agentcoding-agent-monitorcursor

Quick Facts

Stars187
Forks15
LanguageGo
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score74.0533092815519/100
Last Updated2026-09-14
Created2026-03-06
Platformsclaude-code, cli, codex, go
Est. Tokens~19k

lazyagent alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a lazyagent alternative? If you're comparing lazyagent with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • hcom by aannoo · ⭐ 530

    Let AI agents message, watch, and spawn each other across terminals. Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI, Curs

  • gob by juanibiapina · ⭐ 72

    Process manager for AI agents (and humans)

  • golembot by 0xranx · ⭐ 322

    Any Agent × Any Provider × Anywhere. Connect Cursor, Claude Code, OpenCode, or Codex to Slack, Telegram, Disco

  • bridle by neiii · ⭐ 433

    TUI / CLI config manager for agentic harnesses (Amp, Claude Code, Opencode, Goose, Copilot CLI, Crush, Droid)

  • palot by ItsWendell · ⭐ 190

    Just another desktop client for OpenCode 2. Manage projects, sessions, parallel agents, requests, and changes

  • honeymux by honeymux · ⭐ 83

    All of your agents, shells, and TUIs in one durable terminal workspace

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular Go Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is lazyagent?

lazyagent is Monitor all your coding agents from one terminal - Claude Code, Cursor, OpenCode, pi and more. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 187 GitHub stars.

What programming language is lazyagent written in?

lazyagent is primarily written in Go. It covers topics such as agent-dashboard, agent-monitoring, ai.

How do I install or use lazyagent?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the lazyagent GitHub repository at github.com/illegalstudio/lazyagent. The project has 187 stars and 15 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does lazyagent use?

lazyagent is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to lazyagent?

The top alternatives to lazyagent on Agent Skills Hub include hcom, gob, golembot. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools