mcptrustchecker — repository deleted, archived audit

Repository no longer available — illiahaidar/mcptrustchecker returns 404 on GitHub. It was deleted, or its owner's account was removed. The data below is our last successful snapshot.

by illiahaidar · MCP Server · ★ 168

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is mcptrustchecker safe to install? View the security audit →

About mcptrustchecker

🛡️ MCP Trust Checker The local-first, deterministic security scanner for MCP servers Know whether a Model Context Protocol server is safe before you connect it to your data. Zero install? Run the same deterministic engine as a free public web API → mcptrustchecker.com/api · offline · deterministic · no account · OAuth browser login for protected servers · reads the real published n

aiartificial-intelligencemcpmcp-protocolmcp-securitymcp-serversmcp-toolsmodel-context-protocolmodelcontextprotocolprompt-injection

Quick Facts

Stars168
Forks5
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score72.9762651172401/100
Last Updated2026-07-26
Created2026-07-13
Platformsmcp, node
Est. Tokens~20k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with mcptrustchecker for enhanced workflows:

  • ClawGuard — semantic(0.26)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (64%)
  • Armorer — semantic(0.21)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (62%)

mcptrustchecker alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a mcptrustchecker alternative? If you're comparing mcptrustchecker with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • hasmcp-ce by hasmcp · ⭐ 62

    HasMCP Community Edition

  • tunnel-client by openai · ⭐ 438

    Customer-run client for Secure MCP Tunnel: connect private or localhost MCP servers to ChatGPT, Codex, the Res

  • golf by golf-mcp · ⭐ 840

    Production-Ready MCP Server Framework • Build, deploy & scale secure AI agent infrastructure • Includes Auth,

  • octocode-mcp by bgauryy · ⭐ 838

    MCP server for semantic code research and context generation on real-time using LLM patterns | Search naturall

  • mcp-client-for-ollama by jonigl · ⭐ 823

    Harness the power of local LLMs with this TUI MCP Client for Ollama. Featuring all core MCP primitives (tools,

  • jadx-mcp-server by zinja-coder · ⭐ 764

    MCP server for JADX-AI Plugin

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is mcptrustchecker?

mcptrustchecker is Security scanner for MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers — reads the real published npm/PyPI source, not just metadata, to catch tool poisoning, prompt injection, toxic flows & supply-chain risk. Off. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 168 GitHub stars.

What programming language is mcptrustchecker written in?

mcptrustchecker is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as ai, artificial-intelligence, mcp.

How do I install or use mcptrustchecker?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the mcptrustchecker GitHub repository at github.com/illiahaidar/mcptrustchecker. The project has 168 stars and 5 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does mcptrustchecker use?

mcptrustchecker is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to mcptrustchecker?

The top alternatives to mcptrustchecker on Agent Skills Hub include hasmcp-ce, tunnel-client, golf. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools