by itaywol · MCP Server · ★ 9
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 9 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-25 |
| Created | 2026-06-01 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, go, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
Cross-harness AI skill portability CLI. Author an agent skill once, sync it into Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Codex, OpenCode & 45+ AI coding agents. Safety scanner, content-hash drift detection. A package manager / dotfiles for AI coding agent skills.
Looking for a adeptability alternative? If you're comparing adeptability with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Process manager for AI agents (and humans)
The hivemind for AI coding agents — persistent team context recorded once and recalled across agents, machines
The open-source skill registry for AI coding agents. Create, manage, and distribute SKILL.md files across Open
Local-first project management and persistent context for OpenClaw, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and multi-agen
Local-first AI knowledge layer. Extract architecture, query from any AI tool via MCP. Private by architecture.
Automated loop driver, slash commands, council automation, MCP browser bridge, and portfolio governance for Cl
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: