jev-ultrafast-mcp — security grade SAFE, quality 69/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 69/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by jiawei686 · MCP Server · ★ 18

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is jev-ultrafast-mcp safe to install? View the security audit →

About jev-ultrafast-mcp

Hand a whole browser task off in one call: a decision model drives the page server-side, so a flow costs one call, not a turn per click. Ref-based element tables, code-checked assertions, zero-model macro replay, over the Chrome DevTools Protocol.

agent-toolsai-agentsbrowser-agentbrowser-automationbrowser-usecdpchrome-devtools-protocolclaudeclaude-codecursor

Quick Facts

Stars18
Forks2
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score69.2509601374988/100
Last Updated2026-09-23
Created2026-09-19
Platformsbrowser, claude-code, cli, mcp, python, vscode
Est. Tokens~24k

jev-ultrafast-mcp alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a jev-ultrafast-mcp alternative? If you're comparing jev-ultrafast-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • browser-mcp by Agent360dk · ⭐ 50

    The browser tool that can stop and ask you. A 2FA code, a CAPTCHA, a choice only you can make: it asks on your

  • chrome-agent by sderosiaux · ⭐ 89

    Web tasks that compile. Other browser tools tell your AI agent the click worked. chrome-agent reads the page b

  • camofox-mcp by redf0x1 · ⭐ 99

    Anti-detection browser MCP server for AI agents — navigate, interact, and automate the web without getting blo

  • youtube-connector-mcp by ShellyDeng08 · ⭐ 71

    MCP server for YouTube — search videos, get transcripts, channels, and playlists. Works with Claude, Cursor &

  • deterministic-agent-control-protocol by elliot35 · ⭐ 88

    Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT

  • intellegix-code-agent-toolkit by intellegix · ⭐ 57

    Automated loop driver, slash commands, council automation, MCP browser bridge, and portfolio governance for Cl

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is jev-ultrafast-mcp?

jev-ultrafast-mcp is Hand a whole browser task off in one call: a decision model drives the page server-side, so a flow costs one call, not a turn per click. Ref-based element tables, code-checked assertions, zero-model m. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 18 GitHub stars.

What programming language is jev-ultrafast-mcp written in?

jev-ultrafast-mcp is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent-tools, ai-agents, browser-agent.

How do I install or use jev-ultrafast-mcp?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the jev-ultrafast-mcp GitHub repository at github.com/jiawei686/jev-ultrafast-mcp. The project has 18 stars and 2 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does jev-ultrafast-mcp use?

jev-ultrafast-mcp is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to jev-ultrafast-mcp?

The top alternatives to jev-ultrafast-mcp on Agent Skills Hub include browser-mcp, chrome-agent, camofox-mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools