by kenneives · MCP Server · ★ 5
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 5 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 76/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-17 |
| Created | 2026-02-19 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
MCP server that translates design tokens between platforms — Tailwind, Figma, CSS to Material 3, SwiftUI, and CSS Variables. Built for the v0 → Figma → Claude Code pipeline.
Looking for a design-token-bridge-mcp alternative? If you're comparing design-token-bridge-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Desktop app for multi-workspace Claude Code management
Stop Claude Code/Cursor from guessing UI. Extract any website's design system into a spec-valid DESIGN.md that
AI agent skills, agent teams, MCP servers, and tools that make AI coding assistants better at Swift and iOS de
A Claude skill that audits designs against 19 professional design rules.
Claude Code skill for Xcode SwiftUI workflow auditing
On-demand design systems from any URL. Five surfaces, one agent: web, API, CLI, TypeScript SDK, and a portable
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: