by kraayenjon · MCP Server · ★ 206
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 206 |
| Forks | 46 |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Open Issues | 19 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-27 |
| Created | 2026-09-18 |
| Platforms | mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~28k |
Awesome Jev A curated list of Jev use cases, projects, SDKs, tools, and learning resources. Jev is the first System One model from TypeSafe AI — an AI model that returns typed decisions (Choice, Score, Noul) with calibrated probabilities instead of generated text.
Looking for a awesome-jev alternative? If you're comparing awesome-jev with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Awesome Jev — evidence-graded index of TypeSafe System One: SDKs, MCP tools, agents, apps and open models. 20
Awesome list of TypeSafe AI Jev use cases: 74 demos ranked by likes, 150+ GitHub repos, limits, cost and API e
🔥🔥 Awesome Jev: open-source models, projects, benchmarks, and independent evaluations for Jev and System On
The pipe layer of an AI nervous system — one interface connecting provider neurons to your application, across
An unofficial local visualizer for Jev (TypeSafe): a live view of every call your code makes. Not affiliated w
Awesome Jev: source-backed open-source ecosystem radar, plain-language project discovery, and automatic GitHub
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: