lgtm — security grade CAUTION, quality 69/100

Security audit verdict: CAUTION · quality 69/100

Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by kunkka19xx · Codex Skill · ★ 61

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is lgtm safe to install? View the security audit →

About lgtm

lgtm Read what your agent wrote - before you say LGTM. A terminal diff reviewer for agentic coding. It runs in a pane beside your agent, shows what changed as it changes, and lets you point at exact lines when you reply. You keep your editor, and review code with vim motions. https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0eb27774-9c64-43c2-ba22-b392fb58c734 Side-by-side diff view It began a long time ago as a Go tool for reading diffs in a terminal. This is a rewrite in Zig, rebuilt around a coding agent rather than a person: the diff re-renders as the agent writes, references go straight to its input, and comments follow the code when it rewrites the file underneath them. The loop works end to end. Why Reviewing an agent is not reviewing a person: more code, arriving faster, with no prior about where the risk is. Without this, the loop goes - the agent edits six files, you scroll in a pager, you spot something at , and you retype that path into the chat. removes the retyping. Install macOS, from the tap: sh brew insta

agentagentic-aiagentic-workflowagentsclaude-codeclicli-toolcodexdeveloper-toolsdiff

Quick Facts

Stars61
Forks5
LanguageZig
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score69.4425312827607/100
Open Issues6
Last Updated2026-09-29
Created2026-08-26
Platformsclaude-code, cli, codex
Est. Tokens~17k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with lgtm for enhanced workflows:

  • zagi — semantic(0.29)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (65%)

lgtm alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a lgtm alternative? If you're comparing lgtm with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • seance by no1msd · ⭐ 133

    A scrolling terminal multiplexer that tracks your AI coding agents.

  • gob by juanibiapina · ⭐ 72

    Process manager for AI agents (and humans)

  • vnx-orchestration by Vinix24 · ⭐ 62

    Governance-first orchestration for Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI — parallel workers, receipts, quality ga

  • zagi by mattzcarey · ⭐ 290

    better git cli for agents

  • toktrack by mag123c · ⭐ 192

    Ultra-fast token & cost tracker for LLM Token Usage (e.g. Claude Code)

  • GitWand by devlint · ⭐ 180

    The Git client that actually resolves conflicts: 8 deterministic patterns auto-resolve the ones that were neve

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular Zig Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is lgtm?

lgtm is Read what your agent wrote before you say LGTM. A fast TUI in Zig for reviewing code with vim motions.. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 61 GitHub stars.

What programming language is lgtm written in?

lgtm is primarily written in Zig. It covers topics such as agent, agentic-ai, agentic-workflow.

How do I install or use lgtm?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the lgtm GitHub repository at github.com/kunkka19xx/lgtm. The project has 61 stars and 5 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does lgtm use?

lgtm is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to lgtm?

The top alternatives to lgtm on Agent Skills Hub include seance, gob, vnx-orchestration. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools