EDDI — security grade SAFE, quality 64/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 64/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by labsai · MCP Server · ★ 379

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is EDDI safe to install? View the security audit →

About EDDI

E.D.D.I — Multi-Agent Orchestration Middleware for Conversational AI E.D.D.I (Enhanced Dialog Driven Interface) is a production-grade, config-driven multi-agent orchestration middleware for conversational AI. It coordinates users, AI agents, and business systems through intelligent routing, persistent memory, and API orchestration — without writing code. Built with Java 25 and Quarkus. Ships as a Red Hat-certified Docker image. Native support for MCP (Model Context P

a2aai-agentsai-orchestrationchatbotconversation-memoryconversational-aidockerenterprise-aijavalangchain4j

Quick Facts

Stars379
Forks128
LanguageJava
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score63.7727599927809/100
Open Issues61
Last Updated2026-09-22
Created2016-10-13
Platformscli, docker, java, mcp
Est. Tokens~25k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with EDDI for enhanced workflows:

  • sandbox-conversant-lib — semantic(0.33)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop (46%)
  • GoalChain — semantic(0.31)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop (45%)

EDDI alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a EDDI alternative? If you're comparing EDDI with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • trpc-agent-go by trpc-group · ⭐ 1.8k

    A Go framework for building production agent systems with graph workflows, tools, memory, A2A, AG-UI, MCP, eva

  • solon-ai by opensolon · ⭐ 455

    Java AI application development framework (supports LLM-tool,skill; RAG; MCP; Agent-ReAct,Team-Agent). Compati

  • boluobobo-ai-court-tutorial by wanikua · ⭐ 1.6k

    AI 朝廷搭建完整教程 - 从零基础到进阶

  • antigravity-workspace-template by study8677 · ⭐ 1.3k

    Give Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI a ChatGPT for your codebase. Multi-agent knowledge engine, grounded Q&A wi

  • sre by SmythOS · ⭐ 1.3k

    The SmythOS Runtime Environment (SRE) is an open-source, cloud-native runtime for agentic AI. Secure, modular,

  • LLM-Agents-Ecosystem-Handbook by oxbshw · ⭐ 541

    One-stop handbook for building, deploying, and understanding LLM agents with 60+ skeletons, tutorials, ecosyst

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Java Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is EDDI?

EDDI is Config-driven engine that turns JSON into production-grade AI agents. Multi-agent orchestration, 12+ LLM providers, MCP/A2A protocols, RAG, persistent memory, and enterprise compliance (EU AI Act, GDP. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 379 GitHub stars.

What programming language is EDDI written in?

EDDI is primarily written in Java. It covers topics such as a2a, ai-agents, ai-orchestration.

How do I install or use EDDI?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the EDDI GitHub repository at github.com/labsai/EDDI. The project has 379 stars and 128 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does EDDI use?

EDDI is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to EDDI?

The top alternatives to EDDI on Agent Skills Hub include trpc-agent-go, solon-ai, boluobobo-ai-court-tutorial. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools