cli-jaw — security grade SAFE, quality 67/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 67/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by lidge-jun · MCP Server · ★ 208

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is cli-jaw safe to install? View the security audit →

About cli-jaw

CLI-JAW Your personal AI agent. 2 lines to install. 13 AI runtime surfaces in one dashboard. English / 한국어 / 中文 / 日本語 Install Safe install — for existing users who want minimal changes Windows users should use the WSL install path below. Native PowerShell is not the supported CLI-JAW install target. That's it. Open http://localhost:24576 for the manager dashboard. Per-instance agent Web UIs still run from http://localhost:3457 when you start . Requires Node.js 22.4+.

aiassistantautomationclaudeclicodexcopilotgeminimcpmulti-agent

Quick Facts

Stars208
Forks33
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score66.5219920813333/100
Open Issues24
Last Updated2026-09-22
Created2026-02-25
Platformsclaude-code, cli, codex, gemini, mcp, node
Est. Tokens~21k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with cli-jaw for enhanced workflows:

  • bit-office — semantic(0.25)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (58%)
  • openclaw — semantic(0.31)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+shared_platform (56%)

cli-jaw alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a cli-jaw alternative? If you're comparing cli-jaw with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • Overture by SixHq · ⭐ 641

    Overture is an open-source, locally running web interface delivered as an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server

  • agnix by agent-sh · ⭐ 422

    The missing linter and lsp for AI coding assistants. Validate CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SKILL.md, hooks, MCP. Plug

  • agentsys by agent-sh · ⭐ 984

    AI writes code. This automates everything else · 24 plugins · 49 agents · 44 skills · for Claude Code, OpenCod

  • ClaudeR by IMNMV · ⭐ 337

    Connect RStudio to Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, and other LLM agents via MCP. Multi-agent orchestration, automa

  • sudocode by sudocode-ai · ⭐ 292

    Lightweight agent orchestration dev tool that lives in your repo

  • claude-code-open by kill136 · ⭐ 158

    Open source AI coding platform with Web IDE, multi-agent system, 37+ tools, MCP protocol. MIT licensed.

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is cli-jaw?

cli-jaw is 🦈 2-line install personal AI assistant. 11 AI runtime surfaces (Claude, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, Grok, Antigravity, OpenCode, Copilot), 200+ skills, zero ban risk.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 208 GitHub stars.

What programming language is cli-jaw written in?

cli-jaw is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as ai, assistant, automation.

How do I install or use cli-jaw?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the cli-jaw GitHub repository at github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw. The project has 208 stars and 33 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does cli-jaw use?

cli-jaw is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to cli-jaw?

The top alternatives to cli-jaw on Agent Skills Hub include Overture, agnix, agentsys. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools