No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by luji12 · Codex Skill · ★ 81
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is daily-photo-playground safe to install? View the security audit →
daily-photo-playground 一个将日常摄影照片重构为 3:4 竖版高饱和情绪作品页的 Codex skill。 它强调“暖白外部页面 + 高饱和内部版心”的两级结构，并保留： 放大、切出并海报化的主主体 1 个完整可读的小型原照片窗口 1–3 个来自原图的纯色几何元素 进入中央构图、克制有层级的文字排版 连续留白与点线面关系 文件 ：skill 主说明与工作流程 ：四层结构、空间比例与质量检查规范 ：Codex 显示信息与默认提示词 使用 将此目录作为 skill 使用，并通过 调用。
| Stars | 81 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| Quality Score | 41.4526986182793/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-05 |
| Created | 2026-08-04 |
| Platforms | codex |
| Est. Tokens | ~2k |
Looking for a daily-photo-playground alternative? If you're comparing daily-photo-playground with other codex skill tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A Codex/Claude skill that maintains per-repo operating theory documents.
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
daily-photo-playground is Codex skill for reconstructing everyday photos into 3:4 high-saturation emotional editorial posters. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 81 GitHub stars.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the daily-photo-playground GitHub repository at github.com/luji12/daily-photo-playground. The project has 81 stars and 3 forks, indicating an active community.
The top alternatives to daily-photo-playground on Agent Skills Hub include theorist. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: