technical-writing — security grade SAFE, quality 57/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 57/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by luoling8192 · Codex Skill · ★ 208

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is technical-writing safe to install? View the security audit →

About technical-writing

technical-writing 中文内部技术写作的 agent skill。约束设计文档、评审稿、postmortem、分享稿等场景的语气、句法、结构,让产出贴近技术汇报,避开营销稿和散文气质。 适用场景 写内部技术方案、设计说明、评审文档、分享稿 改一篇文风过满、结论过快、证据不足的技术文章 把聊天记录、讨论结论整理成可传播的技术文档 解释代码、模块边界、架构演进、可观测性、评测方法 不适用:UI 文案、产品营销稿、面向外部用户的帮助文档、机械 API reference。 安装 通过 skills.sh 一行装,自动检测当前 agent 并写入对应目录: 支持 Claude Code、Cursor、Codex、GitHub Copilot、Windsurf、Gemini、Cline、AMP 等主流 agent runtime。装完在对应 agent 里用 Skill 工具调用 即可,也可以在项目的 CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md 里把它列为常用 skill。 手动安装(fallback) 如果不想用 skills.sh,可以直接 clone 后软链接: OpenAI Codex 用户可参考 ,按 Codex 文档注册到本地。 核心约束 先观察,再归纳,再判断,不抢结论 中文里不用破折号 和英文连字符 做分句 中文引号统一用 不要黑话连篇(完整词表见 SKILL.md 的 Buzzword Blocklist) 不写抢结论的词、空评价词、对立句法、过场句、英文翻译腔 结构信息直接用 list,论证顺序用 长文主线:背景 → 拆解现状 → 提出猜想 → 分节解答 → 回指前文 → 影响面 → 可观测性 / eval → 收束 完整规则、改写示例、Few-Shot 修正案例见 。 Credits 灵感和反馈来自 @nekomeowww。 License MIT

agent-skillchineseclaude-codecodexdocumentationtechnical-writing

Quick Facts

Stars208
Forks11
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score57.1848990422531/100
Last Updated2026-05-27
Created2026-05-15
Platformsclaude-code, codex
Est. Tokens~1k

technical-writing alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a technical-writing alternative? If you're comparing technical-writing with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • jdocmunch-mcp by jgravelle · ⭐ 204

    The leading, most token-efficient MCP server for documentation exploration and retrieval via structured sectio

  • compose-skill by aldefy · ⭐ 561

    Jetpack Compose Agent Skill — AI-powered coding guidance with actual androidx/androidx source code receipts. W

  • open-docs by bgauryy · ⭐ 500

    This repository contains documentation created to better understand the open project

  • frontend-design by Ilm-Alan · ⭐ 105

    Frontend design skill for Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI. Eight aesthetic anchors, each locking palette, t

  • kaggle-skill by shepsci · ⭐ 81

    Complete Kaggle integration plugin/skill for AI coding agents — competition reports, dataset/model downloads,

  • codexia by milisp · ⭐ 915

    Lightweight Agent Workstation for Codex CLI + Claude Code — with task scheduler, git worktree & remote control

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is technical-writing?

technical-writing is 中文内部技术写作的 agent skill,约束设计文档 / 评审稿 / postmortem / 分享稿场景的语气、句法、结构. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 208 GitHub stars.

How do I install or use technical-writing?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the technical-writing GitHub repository at github.com/luoling8192/technical-writing. The project has 208 stars and 11 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does technical-writing use?

technical-writing is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to technical-writing?

The top alternatives to technical-writing on Agent Skills Hub include jdocmunch-mcp, compose-skill, open-docs. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools