agentic-ai — security grade SAFE, quality 57/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 57/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by mahmoudrabie · MCP Server · ★ 159

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is agentic-ai safe to install? View the security audit →

About agentic-ai

Agentic AI Research Radar 300+ curated agentic AI papers, benchmarks, frameworks, and real-world systems across 24 domains. Start with Frameworks Contribute a Resource Why This Repo Agentic AI moves fast, and useful work is scattered across papers, code repositories, benchmark releases, technical posts, and domain-specific case studies. This repo tracks high-signal work in one place so builders and researchers can quickly find: frameworks and orchestration patterns for building agents evaluation, testing, and benchmark resources security, safety, and governance research domain applications in healthcare, Physical AI/robotics, software engineering, IoT, education, and more If this saves you research time, starring the repo helps more builders di

agentic-aiai-agentsai-benchmarksai-evaluationai-researchai-safetyai-securityautomationautonomous-agentsawesome-list

Quick Facts

Stars159
Forks6
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score56.56481216746/100
Open Issues2
Last Updated2026-09-25
Created2025-03-21
Platformsmcp
Est. Tokens~17k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with agentic-ai for enhanced workflows:

  • SWE-AF — semantic(0.23)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop (48%)
  • af-deep-research — semantic(0.30)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop (45%)

agentic-ai alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a agentic-ai alternative? If you're comparing agentic-ai with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • awesome-ai-agents by aloth · ⭐ 57

    A curated list of AI agent frameworks, tools, platforms, research papers, and resources

  • agent-builder by strands-agents · ⭐ 428

    An example agent demonstrating streaming, tool use, and interactivity from your terminal. This agent builder c

  • oreilly-ai-agents by sinanuozdemir · ⭐ 299

    An introduction to the world of AI Agents

  • mcp-server by strands-agents · ⭐ 293

    This MCP server provides documentation about Strands Agents to your GenAI tools, so you can use your favorite

  • agent-skills by jdrhyne · ⭐ 241

    A collection of AI agent skills for Clawdbot, Claude Code, Codex

  • awesome-openclaw by vincentkoc · ⭐ 144

    Curated awesome list for OpenClaw (formerly Moltbot/Clawdbot): skills, plugins, memory systems, MCP tools, dep

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is agentic-ai?

agentic-ai is Agentic AI research papers, benchmarks, frameworks, and tools curated across 24 domains.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 159 GitHub stars.

How do I install or use agentic-ai?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the agentic-ai GitHub repository at github.com/mahmoudrabie/agentic-ai. The project has 159 stars and 6 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does agentic-ai use?

agentic-ai is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to agentic-ai?

The top alternatives to agentic-ai on Agent Skills Hub include awesome-ai-agents, agent-builder, oreilly-ai-agents. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools