by martinezsalmeron · MCP Server · ★ 50
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
The open source agentic dental software. Built for AI.
| Stars | 50 |
| Forks | 41 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 48.9315250659798/100 |
| Open Issues | 59 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-22 |
| Created | 2026-03-30 |
| Platforms | cli, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~13k |
These tools work well together with dentalpin for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a dentalpin alternative? If you're comparing dentalpin with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The open source agentic dental software. Built for AI.
Turn feature specs into merged PRs with a self-supervising swarm of coding agents — parallel execution, isolat
Python SDK for healthcare AI — typed, validated FHIR tools for agents, real-time EHR connectivity, production
One desktop for all your AI coding Agent — Claude Code, Codex CLI & Gemini CLI. Auto-detect, one-click install
Polymcp provides a simple and efficient way to interact with MCP servers using custom agents
🐘 Give AI assistants full PostgreSQL DBA superpowers — 30+ tools for performance analysis, bloat detection, l
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
dentalpin is The open source agentic dental software. Built for AI.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 50 GitHub stars.
dentalpin is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agentic-ai, ai-agent, clinic-management.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the dentalpin GitHub repository at github.com/martinezsalmeron/dentalpin. The project has 50 stars and 41 forks, indicating an active community.
The top alternatives to dentalpin on Agent Skills Hub include dentalpin, OmoiOS, HealthChain. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: