by matheusfillipe · MCP Server · ★ 10
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 10 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-10 |
| Created | 2026-06-11 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~24k |
Terminal code review with vi-like bindings. Live diffs, comments the agent answers, PR review, MCP built in.
Looking for a diffler alternative? If you're comparing diffler with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Terminal pixel-art office for AI coding agents — watch your Claude Code sessions type, walk, and nap in a cowo
A memory-first AI agent that remembers why decisions were made — not just the last message. Runs local (Ollama
CLI tool that generates commit messages from git changes, reviews code for quality issues, and provides debugg
AI-powered code quality analysis using MCP to help AI assistants review code more effectively. Analyze git cha
Production-grade GitLab MCP server with 86 tools — full GitLab control from any AI agent (Claude, Cursor, Zed)
htop for your AI costs — real-time terminal monitoring of LLM token usage and spending across providers and co
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: