by miaoxworld · Codex Skill · ★ 1.7k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
openclaw-manager is a codex skill by miaoxworld.
| Stars | 1,699 |
| Forks | 316 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| Quality Score | 36.1488999658045/100 |
| Open Issues | 55 |
| Last Updated | 2026-03-27 |
| Created | 2026-02-01 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~13k |
These tools work well together with openclaw-manager for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a openclaw-manager alternative? If you're comparing openclaw-manager with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The first open-source agent skills builder. Define skills by vibe workflow, run on Claude Code, Cursor, Codex
Bridge Claude Code / Codex to IM platforms — chat with AI coding agents from Telegram, Discord, or Feishu/Lark
📚 Sync skills across all AI CLI tools with one command and simplify team sharing. Supporting Codex, Claude Co
Build tested agent skills and govern their lifecycle through a user-defined marketplace: evidence, discovery,
A Claude or Codex skill for deliberate skill development during AI-assisted coding
Skills for pi coding agent (compatible with Claude Code and Codex CLI)
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
openclaw-manager is an open-source codex skill by miaoxworld with 1.7k GitHub stars.
openclaw-manager is primarily written in TypeScript.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the openclaw-manager GitHub repository at github.com/miaoxworld/openclaw-manager. The project has 1.7k stars and 316 forks, indicating an active community.
The top alternatives to openclaw-manager on Agent Skills Hub include refly, Claude-to-IM-skill, skillshare. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: