by microsoft · LLM Plugin · ★ 450
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/microsoft/OpenRCA.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 450 |
| Forks | 53 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | LLM Plugin |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Open Issues | 14 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-04 |
| Created | 2024-10-30 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
OpenRCA     OpenRCA is a benchmark for assessing LLMs' root cause analysis ability in a software operating scenario. When given a natural language query, LLMs need to analyze large volumes of telemetry data to identify the relevant root cause elements.
These tools work well together with OpenRCA for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a OpenRCA alternative? If you're comparing OpenRCA with other llm plugin tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Promptdesk is a tool designed for effectively creating, organizing, and evaluating prompts and large language
[ICML 2024] LLMCompiler: An LLM Compiler for Parallel Function Calling
An ops AI Agent that understands your infrastructure, finds the root cause, and fixes it — right from Slack, T
[ICLR'25] BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation Towards AGI
A banchmark list for evaluation of large language models.
Resource list for generating JSON using LLMs via function calling, tools, CFG. Libraries, Models, Notebooks, e
Explore other popular llm plugin tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: