anti-ai-slop: An agent skill with multiple gates to check and to remove any AI slop

by misbahsy · Codex Skill · ★ 95

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

How to install anti-ai-slop

git clone https://github.com/misbahsy/anti-ai-slop.git

Taken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 68/100

None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.

Quick Facts

Stars95
Forks2
LanguagePython
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score68/100
Last Updated2026-09-14
Created2026-09-14
Platformsclaude-code, codex, python
Est. Tokens~6k

About anti-ai-slop

anti-ai-slop A skill for Claude Code, Codex, and other coding agents that removes AI-writing tells from a draft and then checks the result before handing it back. What it catches Sentence patterns Negative parallelism. "It isn't a pricing problem. It's a trust problem." Throat-clearing openers. "Here's the thing," "Let me be honest" Faux-insight setups.

anti-ai-slop alternative? Top 1 similar tools

Looking for a anti-ai-slop alternative? If you're comparing anti-ai-slop with other codex skill tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • theorist by blader · ⭐ 191

    A Codex/Claude skill that maintains per-repo operating theory documents.

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools