by modelscope · MCP Server · ★ 252
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 252 |
| Forks | 17 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Open Issues | 6 |
| Last Updated | 2025-09-03 |
| Created | 2025-04-13 |
| Platforms | browser, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~6634k |
🦊 MCPBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating MCP Servers [![Documentation][docs-image]][docs-url] [![Package License][package-license-image]][package-license-url] 中文 | English MCPBench is an evaluation framework for MCP Servers. It supports the evaluation of three types of servers: Web Search, Database Query and GAIA, and is compatible with both local and remote MCP Servers.
Looking for a MCPBench alternative? If you're comparing MCPBench with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Neo4j Labs Model Context Protocol servers
The official Redis MCP Server is a natural language interface designed for agentic applications to manage and
An MCP server to query any Postgres database in natural language.
MCP server for enabling LLM applications to perform deep research via the MCP protocol
🐘 Give AI assistants full PostgreSQL DBA superpowers — 30+ tools for performance analysis, bloat detection, l
An MCP server that lets LLM agents play Civilization VI.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: