brain-mcp — security grade SAFE, quality 71/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 71/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by mordechaipotash · MCP Server · ★ 67

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is brain-mcp safe to install? View the security audit →

About brain-mcp

brain-mcp v1.0 Transportable AI memory, now shipping as a distributable. Your AI conversation history, queryable from any MCP-aware LLM, stored entirely on your machine. What changed in v1.0 brain-mcp v0.x was a hosted SHELET reference implementation pointed at a Supabase substrate. v1.0 is a thin MCP server that wraps the Bob protocol. Storage moved from cloud Postgres to local parquets under . The protocol is free; brain-mcp is one implementation; a paid tier (cloud sync, recipes) is opt-in and lives in a separate package. The 53 of you who starred v0.x: thank you. v1.0 is the version we were always going to build — memory belongs to the rememberer is the architecture that makes the product possible, not just the pitch. What v1.0 inherits The 8-tool surface (, , , , , , , ). The "AI assistant readme" frame — your LLM reads this README and gets dramatically more useful. The c

adhdai-memoryapple-siliconchatgptclaudeclaude-codecognitive-prostheticcontext-engineeringconversation-analysiscursor

Quick Facts

Stars67
Forks13
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score71.2383672714248/100
Open Issues3
Last Updated2026-08-20
Created2026-01-10
Platformsclaude-code, codex, mcp, python
Est. Tokens~15k

brain-mcp alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a brain-mcp alternative? If you're comparing brain-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • omega-memory by omega-memory · ⭐ 218

    Persistent memory for AI coding agents

  • codebase-context by PatrickSys · ⭐ 61

    Codebase Context gives AI agents understanding of your codebase through semantic code search, team conventions

  • ChatCrystal by ZengLiangYi · ⭐ 58

    Local-first AI PKM for coding conversations: import Claude Code/Cursor/Codex, distill notes, semantic search,

  • safari-mcp by achiya-automation · ⭐ 204

    Native Safari browser automation for AI agents. 98 tools via AppleScript — zero overhead, keeps logins, runs s

  • mychatarchive by 1ch1n · ⭐ 65

    Local-first AI memory archive. Import ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok exports, generate semantic embeddings, and sea

  • task-orchestrator by jpicklyk · ⭐ 205

    Server-enforced workflow discipline for AI agents. An MCP server providing persistent work items, dependency g

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is brain-mcp?

brain-mcp is Local-first AI memory MCP server — query your ChatGPT, Claude Code, Cursor & Codex history from any LLM. DuckDB+parquet.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 67 GitHub stars.

What programming language is brain-mcp written in?

brain-mcp is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as adhd, ai-memory, apple-silicon.

How do I install or use brain-mcp?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the brain-mcp GitHub repository at github.com/mordechaipotash/brain-mcp. The project has 67 stars and 13 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does brain-mcp use?

brain-mcp is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to brain-mcp?

The top alternatives to brain-mcp on Agent Skills Hub include omega-memory, codebase-context, ChatCrystal. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools