by mrmike · MCP Server · ★ 101
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
uv tool install git+https://github.com/mrmike/android-source-explorer-mcpTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 101 |
| Forks | 5 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 76/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-13 |
| Created | 2026-03-12 |
| Platforms | mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
Android Source Explorer MCP Server MCP server for exploring AOSP internals and Jetpack libraries. Purpose When building Android applications, AI tools often rely on outdated training data or incomplete summaries of the Android Framework.
Looking for a android-source-explorer-mcp alternative? If you're comparing android-source-explorer-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
AI-powered E2E testing for 10 platforms. 253 MCP tools. Zero config. Works with Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, Copi
A phone control plugin for MCP that allows you to control your Android phone through ADB commands to connect a
On-device AI for Android — LLM chat (GGUF/llama.cpp), vision models (VLM), image generation (Stable Diffusion)
Control your Android devices with AI using Model Context Protocol
Claude Code skill for building modern Android apps following best practices.
Turn your Solana Seeker (or any Android phone) into a 24/7 personal AI agent
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: