by narenkatakam · Codex Skill · ★ 9
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 9 |
| Forks | 6 |
| Language | HTML |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 66/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-30 |
| Created | 2026-02-27 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
Give your AI coding assistant a design eye. 12 principles, 13 reference docs, 7 component checklists. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Windsurf.
Looking for a ux-audit alternative? If you're comparing ux-audit with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A modular UX, design, and product optimisation system for turning AI-built interfaces into production-grade ap
Stop Claude Code/Cursor from guessing UI. Extract any website's design system into a spec-valid DESIGN.md that
Design intelligence engine for AI coding tools (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf). Deterministic anti-AI-slop lin
A verification-first engineering toolkit for Claude Code. Built for senior ICs and tech leads who already know
Stop "vibe coding" and start Stream Coding, the 10-20x velocity methodology for AI-accelerated development. In
A Claude skill that audits designs against 19 professional design rules.
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: