by nattergabriel · Codex Skill · ★ 46
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 46 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 69/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-09 |
| Created | 2026-03-21 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, go |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
A CLI tool for managing and distributing agent skills across projects
Looking for a reseed alternative? If you're comparing reseed with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Notion MCP server with token auth: connect Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code and Codex to Notion pa
MCP server for free Google AI Mode search with citations. Query optimization, CAPTCHA handling, multi-agent su
Better 'AskUserQuestion' - A lightweight MCP server/OpenCode plugin/Agent Skills + CLI tool that allows your L
Portable SKILLs workspace for Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini — issue-driven workflows and cross-agent collabor
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
HeyClaude (formerly Claude Pro Directory) is a searchable collection of pre-built AI skills, agents, MCP serve
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: