by niki914 · MCP Server · ★ 141
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 141 |
| Forks | 10 |
| Language | Kotlin |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 52/100 |
| Open Issues | 29 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-06 |
| Created | 2026-06-05 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
中文 | English <img...
These tools work well together with zafiro for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a zafiro alternative? If you're comparing zafiro with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Nexus | Take over your Android voice assistant with a custom AI agent — connect any LLM (Claude, GPT, Gemini),
RikkaHub Agent · Pure — an Android AI agent that survives long runs. Independent hardening pass on the rikkahu
Agent! Is a native macOS App that works with any LLM [local and cloud], [open source and paid] Claude, OpenAI,
The missing linter and lsp for AI coding assistants. Validate CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SKILL.md, hooks, MCP. Plug
Native Android AI agent: use your own API keys (OpenAI/Anthropic/Gemini), opencode-style modes, device tools,
AI-powered chat-first terminal IDE for Android. Built entirely on a phone, by someone who can't write code.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: