by nikships · MCP Server · ★ 22
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 22 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-28 |
| Created | 2026-05-21 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, go, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~21k |
Your personal GitHub registry for AI Agent Skills. One repo. EVERY agent. EVERY device. Loaded on demand — Zero startup bloat.
Looking for a skills-registry alternative? If you're comparing skills-registry with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
AI-powered code quality analysis using MCP to help AI assistants review code more effectively. Analyze git cha
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
MCP server for YouTube — search videos, get transcripts, channels, and playlists. Works with Claude, Cursor &
Convert LangChain tools to FastMCP tools
Complete Kaggle integration plugin/skill for AI coding agents — competition reports, dataset/model downloads,
Vendor-neutral MCP configuration manager — one CLI to add, toggle, and audit MCP servers and skills across eve
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: