by no-human-ai · MCP Server · ★ 317
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
From ticket to reviewed pull request. Free and open-source, on your machine.
| Stars | 317 |
| Forks | 30 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 56.9879930012053/100 |
| Open Issues | 83 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-18 |
| Created | 2026-08-05 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~13k |
Looking for a no_human alternative? If you're comparing no_human with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Ship features 10x faster. Built In Auto: Memory, K8S Agent & Security (SDD+SDLC) . 😇
Self-hosted browser workspace to run coding agents in parallel, steer work as it runs, review diffs, and ship.
Give Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI a ChatGPT for your codebase. Multi-agent knowledge engine, grounded Q&A wi
Overture is an open-source, locally running web interface delivered as an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server
Jetpack Compose Agent Skill — AI-powered coding guidance with actual androidx/androidx source code receipts. W
Adversarial AI bug hunter with auto-fix skill for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, GitHub Copilot CLI, Kiro CLI
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
no_human is From ticket to reviewed pull request. Free and open-source, on your machine.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 317 GitHub stars.
no_human is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent-harness, agent-orchestration, agentic-ai.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the no_human GitHub repository at github.com/no-human-ai/no_human. The project has 317 stars and 30 forks, indicating an active community.
no_human is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to no_human on Agent Skills Hub include shep, garcon, antigravity-workspace-template. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: