by noplan-inc · Codex Skill · ★ 6
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 6 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 69/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-17 |
| Created | 2026-09-17 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~9k |
A Stop hook that stops your coding agent from stopping too early. Plain-language rules, judged by jev.
Looking for a limpet alternative? If you're comparing limpet with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Stops AI coding agents from claiming work is done without evidence. Deterministic hooks decide, TypeSafe's Jev
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
Local citation-backed recall for Pi, OMP, Claude Code, Codex, and ChatGPT history.
Automatic context preservation for Claude Code. Never lose work to compaction again. 7 hooks, 187 semantic pat
Security hooks and monitoring for Claude Code — quiet overrides, SSRF protection, MCP compression, OTEL tracin
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: