lean-lsp-mcp — security grade SAFE, quality 70/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 70/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by oOo0oOo · MCP Server · ★ 477

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is lean-lsp-mcp safe to install? View the security audit →

About lean-lsp-mcp

lean-lsp-mcp Lean Theorem Prover MCP MCP server that allows agentic interaction with the Lean theorem prover via the Language Server Protocol using leanclient. This server provides a range of tools for LLM agents to understand, analyze and interact with Lean projects. Key Features Rich Lean Interaction: Access diagnostics, goal states, term information, hover documentation and more. External Search Tools: Use , , , and to find relevant theorems and definitions. Easy Setup: Simple configuration for various clients, including VSCode, Cursor and Claude Code. Setup Overview Install uv, a Python package manager. Make sure your Lean project builds quickl

lean4lspmcp

Quick Facts

Stars477
Forks76
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score69.8374412219367/100
Last Updated2026-08-19
Created2025-03-29
Platformsmcp, python
Est. Tokens~18k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with lean-lsp-mcp for enhanced workflows:

  • sf-skills — semantic(0.17)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (51%)
  • claude-code-lsps — semantic(0.47)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop (51%)
  • cclsp — semantic(0.68)+rare_topics+similar_pop+shared_platform (48%)
  • davinci-resolve-mcp — semantic(0.37)+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (48%)
  • MCPTest — semantic(0.49)+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (47%)

lean-lsp-mcp alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a lean-lsp-mcp alternative? If you're comparing lean-lsp-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • cclsp by ktnyt · ⭐ 675

    Claude Code LSP: enhance your Claude Code experience with non-IDE dependent LSP integration.

  • open-ontologies by fabio-rovai · ⭐ 531

    Plan, apply and roll back changes to a production ontology, with a blast radius report and a proof an auditor

  • agnix by agent-sh · ⭐ 422

    The missing linter and lsp for AI coding assistants. Validate CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SKILL.md, hooks, MCP. Plug

  • jacobian by morluto · ⭐ 193

    Composable mathematics tools for agents

  • agent-lsp by blackwell-systems · ⭐ 134

    MCP server that orchestrates language servers into agent-native workflows. 65 tools, 30 CI-verified languages.

  • my-pi by spences10 · ⭐ 129

    Composable Pi coding agent with MCP, LSP, agent chains, prompt presets, and local eval telemetry

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is lean-lsp-mcp?

lean-lsp-mcp is Lean Theorem Prover MCP. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 477 GitHub stars.

What programming language is lean-lsp-mcp written in?

lean-lsp-mcp is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as lean4, lsp, mcp.

How do I install or use lean-lsp-mcp?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the lean-lsp-mcp GitHub repository at github.com/oOo0oOo/lean-lsp-mcp. The project has 477 stars and 76 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does lean-lsp-mcp use?

lean-lsp-mcp is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to lean-lsp-mcp?

The top alternatives to lean-lsp-mcp on Agent Skills Hub include cclsp, open-ontologies, agnix. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools