chrome-devtools-mcp-mux — security grade SAFE, quality 48/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 48/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by ochen1 · MCP Server · ★ 4

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is chrome-devtools-mcp-mux safe to install? View the security audit →

About chrome-devtools-mcp-mux

Multiplex many MCP clients (e.g. multiple Claude Code instances) onto a single chrome-devtools-mcp + Chrome, with per-client tab isolation.

Quick Facts

Stars4
Forks0
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score48.0485/100
Last Updated2026-04-30
Created2026-04-21
Platformsbrowser, claude-code, cli, mcp, node
Est. Tokens~159k

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is chrome-devtools-mcp-mux?

chrome-devtools-mcp-mux is Multiplex many MCP clients (e.g. multiple Claude Code instances) onto a single chrome-devtools-mcp + Chrome, with per-client tab isolation.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 4 GitHub stars.

What programming language is chrome-devtools-mcp-mux written in?

chrome-devtools-mcp-mux is primarily written in TypeScript.

How do I install or use chrome-devtools-mcp-mux?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the chrome-devtools-mcp-mux GitHub repository at github.com/ochen1/chrome-devtools-mcp-mux. The project has 4 stars and 0 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does chrome-devtools-mcp-mux use?

chrome-devtools-mcp-mux is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools