by okooo5km · Codex Skill · ★ 11
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 11 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-19 |
| Created | 2026-09-18 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~11k |
Typed decisions from the shell: an unofficial stdlib-Python CLI and Agent Skill for TypeSafe's Jev model, via the TypeSafe API (default) or OpenRouter. Yes/no, choice and ordinal scores with calibrated probabilities, semantic grep and batch mode.
Looking for a jev alternative? If you're comparing jev with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Ask your house a question, get a number back. Home Assistant integration for TypeSafe Jev: typed answers as se
Open-source alternative to TypeSafe's Jev: a System One style model layer that gives typed, calibrated decisio
Stops AI coding agents from claiming work is done without evidence. Deterministic hooks decide, TypeSafe's Jev
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
🔥🔥 Papers, open reproductions and independent evaluations behind System One models and Jev.
Automated loop driver, slash commands, council automation, MCP browser bridge, and portfolio governance for Cl
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: