gitclaw — security grade SAFE, quality 71/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 71/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by open-gitagent · Codex Skill · ★ 212

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is gitclaw safe to install? View the security audit →

About gitclaw

Gitagent A universal git-native multimodal always learning AI Agent (TinyHuman) Your agent lives inside a git repo — identity, rules, memory, tools, and skills are all version-controlled files. Install • Quick Start • SDK • Architecture • Tools • Hooks • Skills • Plugins Why Gitagent? Most agent frameworks treat configuration as code scattered across your application. Gitagent flips this — your agent IS a git repository: — model, tools, runtime config — personality and identity — behavioral constraints memor

ai-agentsanthropicassistantllmopenclawpersonal

Quick Facts

Stars212
Forks37
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score71.3678217107613/100
Open Issues12
Last Updated2026-04-22
Created2026-03-04
Platformsnode
Est. Tokens~260k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with gitclaw for enhanced workflows:

  • openclaw — semantic(0.16)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+shared_platform (55%)
  • git-mcp-server — semantic(0.17)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (51%)
  • jean — semantic(0.15)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (50%)

gitclaw alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a gitclaw alternative? If you're comparing gitclaw with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • starpod by sinaptik-ai · ⭐ 76

    Open-source AI agent runtime built in Rust. Define once, deploy isolated instances per tenant with built-in me

  • argo by xark-argo · ⭐ 827

    ARGO is an open-source AI Agent platform that brings Local Manus to your desktop. With one-click model downloa

  • vllora by vllora · ⭐ 812

    Debug your AI agents

  • gpt-cli by kharvd · ⭐ 722

    Command-line interface for ChatGPT, Claude and Bard

  • maverick-mcp by wshobson · ⭐ 668

    MaverickMCP - Personal Stock Analysis MCP Server

  • claude-code-mastery by TheDecipherist · ⭐ 548

    The complete guide to Claude Code: CLAUDE.md, hooks, skills, MCP servers, and commands

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is gitclaw?

gitclaw is A universal git-native AI agent framework. Your agent lives inside a git repo — identity, rules, memory, tools, and skills are all version-controlled files.. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 212 GitHub stars.

What programming language is gitclaw written in?

gitclaw is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as ai-agents, anthropic, assistant.

How do I install or use gitclaw?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the gitclaw GitHub repository at github.com/open-gitagent/gitclaw. The project has 212 stars and 37 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does gitclaw use?

gitclaw is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to gitclaw?

The top alternatives to gitclaw on Agent Skills Hub include starpod, argo, vllora. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools