by openakita · Codex Skill · ★ 1.8k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is openakita safe to install? View the security audit →
OpenAkita Open-Source Multi-Agent AI Assistant — Not Just Chat, an AI Team That Gets Things Done <img src="https://img.shields.io/github
| Stars | 1,844 |
| Forks | 262 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | AGPL-3.0 |
| Quality Score | 64.1564014953817/100 |
| Open Issues | 47 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-16 |
| Created | 2026-01-30 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~22k |
Looking for a openakita alternative? If you're comparing openakita with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
ClawX is a desktop app that provides a graphical interface for OpenClaw AI agents. It turns CLI-based AI orche
AI agent microservice
Your on-phone / mobile AI Agent / Claw, capable of operating terminals and performing a wide range of tasks in
🦭 会记忆、能持续推进目标、会动态编排多 Agent 的跨端桌面 AI 助手，也可服务化常驻 NAS / 云端 | A cross-device desktop AI agent with memory, autono
A more beautiful and easier-to-use alternative to OpenClaw. It features a nicer Web UI, built-in IM support, a
The first open-source agent skills builder. Define skills by vibe workflow, run on Claude Code, Cursor, Codex
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
openakita is An open-source AI assistant framework with skills and agent architecture. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 1.8k GitHub stars.
openakita is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent, ai, assistant.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the openakita GitHub repository at github.com/openakita/openakita. The project has 1.8k stars and 262 forks, indicating an active community.
openakita is released under the AGPL-3.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to openakita on Agent Skills Hub include ClawX, core, OpenOmniBot. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.