by ouranos-labs · MCP Server · ★ 4
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 4 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 50/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-05-06 |
| Created | 2026-04-13 |
| Platforms | cli, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~469k |
SpamBrain-proof your pSEO before you publish, audit page relationships, not just pages. AI-triaged findings, 8 LLM providers, local telemetry, cost caps, MCP server.
Looking for a pseolint alternative? If you're comparing pseolint with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Automatic context preservation for Claude Code. Never lose work to compaction again. 7 hooks, 187 semantic pat
MCP server for Google Sheets - Read, write and manipulate spreadsheets through Claude Desktop
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
Simple orchestration for AI Agents built around Vercel's streamText. Lightweight alternative to LangGraph for
The code quality toolkit for the agentic AI era. Find dead code, clones, and scaffolding across 15 languages.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: