by papadopouloskyriakos · MCP Server · ★ 102
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
3-tier agentic ChatOps (n8n + GPT-4o + Claude Code) implementing all 21 patterns from "Agentic Design Patterns" — solo operator managing 137 devices
| Stars | 102 |
| Forks | 28 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 37.2/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-05-05 |
| Created | 2026-03-24 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~445k |
These tools work well together with agentic-chatops for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a agentic-chatops alternative? If you're comparing agentic-chatops with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.
The open agent control plane. Govern autonomous AI agents with pre-execution policy enforcement, approval gate
List of agent orchestrators
An example agent demonstrating streaming, tool use, and interactivity from your terminal. This agent builder c
MCP server for Coolify — 38 optimized tools for managing self-hosted PaaS through AI assistants
This MCP server provides documentation about Strands Agents to your GenAI tools, so you can use your favorite
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
agentic-chatops is 3-tier agentic ChatOps (n8n + GPT-4o + Claude Code) implementing all 21 patterns from "Agentic Design Patterns" — solo operator managing 137 devices. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 102 GitHub stars.
agentic-chatops is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agentic-ai, chatops, claude-code.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the agentic-chatops GitHub repository at github.com/papadopouloskyriakos/agentic-chatops. The project has 102 stars and 28 forks, indicating an active community.
The top alternatives to agentic-chatops on Agent Skills Hub include nWave, cordum, awesome-agent-orchestrators. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.