by paulburgess1357 · MCP Server · ★ 63
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 63 |
| Forks | 7 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 73/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-02 |
| Created | 2026-04-05 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
nvim-mcp An MCP server that gives AI agents first-class access to your running Neovim session. It connects through Neovim's native msgpack-RPC socket — no plugins required. Works with Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, and any MCP-compatible client.
These tools work well together with nvim-mcp for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a nvim-mcp alternative? If you're comparing nvim-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Notion MCP server with token auth: connect Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code and Codex to Notion pa
📜 An MCP server for conversation history search and retrieval in Claude Code
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
MCP server for YouTube — search videos, get transcripts, channels, and playlists. Works with Claude, Cursor &
@ file mentions in neovim. for prompts, notes, commits.
[archived] c4 GenAI Suite
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: