by pragunbhutani · MCP Server · ★ 178
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Flagged: reads sensitive env vars. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 178 |
| Forks | 31 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 70/100 |
| Open Issues | 4 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-01 |
| Created | 2024-02-11 |
| Platforms | mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~280k |
Ragstar — AI Data Analyst for dbt Projects Ragstar is in public βeta. Expect rapid changes and occasional rough edges. What is Ragstar? Ragstar connects to your dbt project, builds a knowledge base from models & documentation, and lets everyone ask data-related questions in plain English via a beautiful web dashboard or Slack.
Looking for a dbt-llm-agent alternative? If you're comparing dbt-llm-agent with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The open context engine for AI agents support 15+ data sources. Built on Rust and Apache DataFusion.
Open-source agentic data engineering harness for dbt, SQL, and cloud warehouses. 100+ tools, 10 warehouses, AI
An MCP server to query any Postgres database in natural language.
An introduction to the world of AI Agents
A Python library powered by Language Models (LLMs) for conversational data discovery and analysis.
🚀 Universal SDK for building next-gen MCP servers
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: