hive-mind — security grade CAUTION, quality 73/100

Security audit verdict: CAUTION · quality 73/100

Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by projectmentor · MCP Server · ★ 56

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is hive-mind safe to install? View the security audit →

About hive-mind

HiveMind Peer-to-peer shared memory for AI agents. When one agent learns something, every other agent on every machine can use it too. Local-first, no cloud, no central server. Website: hivemind.projectmentor.org · Docs: · For developers: hivemind.projectmentor.org/dev The HiveMind dashboard, hv dash. Watch the intro video on the site. HiveMind is a shared, append-only memory that your AI agents read and write as they work. Facts, decisions, and outcomes accumulate over time and earn trust through independent corroboration, not by an agent asserting it. Each machine holds the full memory and syncs directly with its peers over your private Tailscale network. There is no server to operate and nothing leaves your hardware. It is not a vector database or a RAG framework. It is the memory-and-trust layer your agents share s

agent-memoryagenticaiai-agentsai-toolsclaudeclaude-codecrdtfreehermes

Quick Facts

Stars56
Forks3
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseAGPL-3.0
Quality Score72.9223427139466/100
Open Issues22
Last Updated2026-10-03
Created2026-06-03
Platformsclaude-code, mcp, python
Est. Tokens~16k

hive-mind alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a hive-mind alternative? If you're comparing hive-mind with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • claude-historian-mcp by Vvkmnn · ⭐ 178

    📜 An MCP server for conversation history search and retrieval in Claude Code

  • Commonly-used-high-value-skills by seaworld008 · ⭐ 70

    High-value AI skills repository for Codex, Claude Code, OpenClaw, agents, prompts, and automation workflows.

  • montycat-mcp by MontyGovernance · ⭐ 54

    Shared, persistent memory for AI agents. Self-hosted MCP server with semantic search, vector RAG, and live upd

  • deepcontext-mcp by Wildcard-Official · ⭐ 278

    DeepContext is an MCP server that adds symbol-aware semantic search to Claude Code, Codex CLI, and other agent

  • youtube-connector-mcp by ShellyDeng08 · ⭐ 71

    MCP server for YouTube — search videos, get transcripts, channels, and playlists. Works with Claude, Cursor &

  • codemem by kunickiaj · ⭐ 71

    A lightweight persistent-memory companion for OpenCode & Claude

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is hive-mind?

hive-mind is Persistent institutional shared memory as observable middleware for collaborative AI agents. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 56 GitHub stars.

What programming language is hive-mind written in?

hive-mind is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent-memory, agentic, ai.

How do I install or use hive-mind?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the hive-mind GitHub repository at github.com/projectmentor/hive-mind. The project has 56 stars and 3 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does hive-mind use?

hive-mind is released under the AGPL-3.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to hive-mind?

The top alternatives to hive-mind on Agent Skills Hub include claude-historian-mcp, Commonly-used-high-value-skills, montycat-mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools