orionbelt-semantic-layer — security grade SAFE, quality 63/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 63/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by ralforion · MCP Server · ★ 97

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is orionbelt-semantic-layer safe to install? View the security audit →

About orionbelt-semantic-layer

OrionBelt&reg; Semantic Layer and Sidecar Define your metrics once in YAML. Let agents and BI tools query them without ever touching your schema. A semantic sidecar: it rides alongside the systems you already run instead of replacing them. <a href="https:/

agentic-aianalytics-as-codebigquerybusiness-intelligenceclickhousedata-analyticsdatabricksdremioduckdbheadless-bi

Quick Facts

Stars97
Forks9
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
Quality Score62.8849595364862/100
Last Updated2026-09-22
Created2026-02-10
Platformscli, mcp, python
Est. Tokens~23k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with orionbelt-semantic-layer for enhanced workflows:

  • databao-context-engine — semantic(0.54)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (79%)
  • orionbelt-semantic-layer — semantic(1.00)+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (70%)
  • sidemantic — semantic(0.53)+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (63%)

orionbelt-semantic-layer alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a orionbelt-semantic-layer alternative? If you're comparing orionbelt-semantic-layer with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • orionbelt-semantic-layer by ralfbecher · ⭐ 56

    Open-source Semantic Sidecar for AI, analytics, and governed data systems. Compiles declarative YAML models in

  • sidemantic by sidequery · ⭐ 122

    The universal metrics layer. Compatible with 15+ formats: Cube, MetricFlow, LookML, Omni, BSL, LDM, Cortex, Ma

  • bonnard-cli by bonnard-data · ⭐ 50

    Archived. Earlier Bonnard product. Current: bonnard.dev / @bonnard/mcp-charts

  • databao-context-engine by JetBrains · ⭐ 80

    Databao Context Engine is an open-source engine that automatically generates a governed semantic context from

  • MCP-PostgreSQL-Ops by call518 · ⭐ 161

    🐘 Give AI assistants full PostgreSQL DBA superpowers — 30+ tools for performance analysis, bloat detection, l

  • hyperterse by hyperterse · ⭐ 84

    The agentic server framework.

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is orionbelt-semantic-layer?

orionbelt-semantic-layer is Source-available semantic layer and sidecar for agentic AI and governed analytics. Compiles declarative YAML models into optimized SQL, KPIs, and semantic context across 8 SQL dialects.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 97 GitHub stars.

What programming language is orionbelt-semantic-layer written in?

orionbelt-semantic-layer is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agentic-ai, analytics-as-code, bigquery.

How do I install or use orionbelt-semantic-layer?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the orionbelt-semantic-layer GitHub repository at github.com/ralforion/orionbelt-semantic-layer. The project has 97 stars and 9 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to orionbelt-semantic-layer?

The top alternatives to orionbelt-semantic-layer on Agent Skills Hub include orionbelt-semantic-layer, sidemantic, bonnard-cli. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools