by repowise-dev · MCP Server · ★ 18
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 18 |
| Forks | 4 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 70/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-10 |
| Created | 2026-04-10 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~5k |
15 Claude Code skills that change how your agent thinks, debugs, and reviews code. One command install.
Looking for a modpack alternative? If you're comparing modpack with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A verification-first engineering toolkit for Claude Code. Built for senior ICs and tech leads who already know
Stop "vibe coding" and start Stream Coding, the 10-20x velocity methodology for AI-accelerated development. In
Vendor-neutral MCP configuration manager — one CLI to add, toggle, and audit MCP servers and skills across eve
Comprehensive guide for writing professional Claude Standard prompts with MCP, Skills, and Superpowers integra
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
The hivemind for AI coding agents — persistent team context recorded once and recalled across agents, machines
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: