by roampal-ai · MCP Server · ★ 51
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 51 |
| Forks | 7 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 75/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-26 |
| Created | 2025-12-15 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
Roampal — Outcome-Based Persistent Memory MCP Server Two commands. Your AI coding assistant gets outcome-based memory. Works with <
These tools work well together with roampal-core for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a roampal-core alternative? If you're comparing roampal-core with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Persistent long-term memory for Claude Code via MCP — captures coding decisions, bugfixes, and context across
Persistent memory for AI coding agents
Server-enforced workflow discipline for AI agents. An MCP server providing persistent work items, dependency g
📜 An MCP server for conversation history search and retrieval in Claude Code
MCP server that lets Claude Code and other AI agents read and search large PDFs, one file or a whole folder: a
MCP Fusion - The framework for AI-native MCP servers.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: