No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by rrezartprebreza · MCP Server · ★ 258
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is spring-boot-skills safe to install? View the security audit →
Drop a skill into your project. Your AI coding agent instantly understands your Spring Boot codebase — architecture, patterns, conventions — and codes like a senior engineer who's been on your team for years. [ server
Jetpack Compose Agent Skill — AI-powered coding guidance with actual androidx/androidx source code receipts. W
Spec-driven development with smart compaction. Claude Code plugin combining Ralph Wiggum loop with structured
Security-audited skills for Claude, Codex & Claude Code. One-click install, quality verified.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
spring-boot-skills is Production-grade Claude Code and Codex skills for Spring Boot developers. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 258 GitHub stars.
spring-boot-skills is primarily written in Java. It covers topics such as ai-coding-agent, claude, claude-ai.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the spring-boot-skills GitHub repository at github.com/rrezartprebreza/spring-boot-skills. The project has 258 stars and 40 forks, indicating an active community.
spring-boot-skills is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to spring-boot-skills on Agent Skills Hub include cursor-rules-java, ios-simulator-skill, Overture. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: