by sbhooley · MCP Server · ★ 671
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
pipx install 'ainativelang[mcp]' && ainl setup --auto
pip install ainativelang
Taken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 671 |
| Forks | 24 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 62/100 |
| Open Issues | 12 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-03 |
| Created | 2026-03-10 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~25k |
AI Native Lang (AINL) Find Us on X: @ainativelang <a h
Looking for a ainativelang alternative? If you're comparing ainativelang with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Command a fleet of AI agents, on every deck, every desk, every wrist. Self-hosted multi-agent platform with me
Deterministic orchestrator for 30+ CLI AI coding agents. Git worktree isolation, HMAC audit trail, MCP server
Open-source self-hosted AI agent runtime and multi-agent framework for autonomous agent swarms. Agent memory,
A collection of AI agent skills for Clawdbot, Claude Code, Codex
Reusable project context and specialist workflows for the AI tools you already use. Agents, skills, rules and
The scaffold for your ultra-personalized, multi-model AI harness in pure natural language.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: