by scaling-group · Codex Skill · ★ 55
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 55 |
| Forks | 8 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-20 |
| Created | 2026-04-30 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
EvE: Evolutionary Ensemble of Agents Scientific Computing and Intelligence Group (Scaling Group) @ NUS Paper · Overview · Quick Start · How It Works · Set Up Your Own Task · <a href="#example-icon-context-length-g
These tools work well together with eve for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a eve alternative? If you're comparing eve with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Fully Autonomous AI Research System with Self-Evolution, built natively on Claude Code
Asks what to optimise and how to measure it, then runs experiments on its own branch.
A collection of AI agent skills for Clawdbot, Claude Code, Codex
A curated list of AI Agent evolution, memory systems, multi-agent architectures, and self-improvement projects
Reusable project context and specialist workflows for the AI tools you already use. Agents, skills, rules and
Just another desktop client for OpenCode 2. Manage projects, sessions, parallel agents, requests, and changes
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: