openclaw-prompts-and-skills: Telegram bot that talks to headless Claude Code - proof of concept

by seedprod · Codex Skill · ★ 93

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

Security audit verdict: UNSAFE · quality 73/100

Flagged: reads agent memory. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.

Quick Facts

Stars93
Forks20
LanguagePython
CategoryCodex Skill
Quality Score73/100
Last Updated2026-01-31
Created2026-01-31
Platformsclaude-code, python
Est. Tokens~9k

About openclaw-prompts-and-skills

OpenClaw Prompts and Skills If you've seen OpenClaw demos and wondered "how does it feel so human?" — this repo has the answer. The Short Version OpenClaw's personality comes from markdown files. That's it. No secret sauce, no special model fine-tuning. Just well-crafted prompts that get injected into the system prompt before every message.

openclaw-prompts-and-skills alternative? Top 1 similar tools

Looking for a openclaw-prompts-and-skills alternative? If you're comparing openclaw-prompts-and-skills with other codex skill tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • theorist by blader · ⭐ 191

    A Codex/Claude skill that maintains per-repo operating theory documents.

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools